Veteran: Comment on the Wolfe vs VA case
Comment on the Wolfe versus VA case Wolfe & Boerschinger v. Wilkie, No.18-6091(DATED: September 9, 2019 PER CURIAM); 38 C.F.R. § 17.1005(a)(5) is invalid because it is contrary to 38 U.S.C. §1725; reimbursement of emergency medical care at non-VA facilities References below. The Court's opinion and the process leave me with big questions and that the VA can be ordered in a direction that will fix the problem. The Court and NVLSP have the entire basis for the case wrong. The estimated cost does appear more sensational than factual. Unless the basis changes the DVA will not change its business rules. The Law says: Statute 38 USC 1725 (c) (4) (D) states “The Secretary may not reimburse a veteran under this section for any copayment or similar payment that the veteran owes the third party or for which the veteran is responsible under a health-plan contract." The statute means: When the veteran’s insurance company pays a provider the insurance’s sh...